CJP’s report analyzes ten years of Chicago Police Board cases and decisions. The study examines the charges filed with the Chicago Police Board and their resulting decisions over the past ten years.
This ten year analysis by the Chicago Justice Project (CJP) is one of the most comprehensive examinations ever completed of the Chicago Police Board members’ voting patterns and decision making process. We feel that the results of the study should spur greater discussion on the powers, responsibilities, and practices of the Chicago Police Board. You can see our recommendations in our Executive Summary and also in our Full Report. You will also find the data set we analyzed for our study in both SPSS and comma separated values format. We have included those in our release in case you would like to verify our findings.
- Press Release Announcing Report – CJP Press Release
- Chicago Police Board: A Ten-Year Analysis – Fact Sheets
- Chicago Police Board: A Ten-Year Analysis – Executive Summary
- Chicago Police Board: A Ten-Year Analysis – Full Report
The Resulting Reform – A New Ordinance
Alderman Robert Fioretti (2nd) as Chief Sponsor introduced an ordinance in the Chicago City Council today seeking to alter the practices and transparency of the Chicago Police Board. The new ordinance takes into account the research conducted by the Chicago Justice Project and many of our recommendations. A copy of the ordinance is included below for download. The following alderman signed on as sponsors of the new ordinance: Toni Preckwinkle (4th), Scott Waguepack (32nd), Joe Moore (49th), Pat Dowell (3rd), Ricardo Munoz (22nd) Ed Smith (28th), Sandi Jackson (7th), Leslie Hairston (5th), Howard Brookins Jr. (21st), Manuel Flores (1st). You can download a copy of our press release related to the new ordinance below.
- Chicago Justice Project study results in proposed amendments to Chicago Police Board ordinance – CJP Press Release
- Downloadable copy of the new ordinance
Sample Decisions
Here are samples of decisions made by members of the Chicago Police Board over the course of the ten year analysis. We have included these samples to assist your understanding of both how we gathered our data and also what information is communicated, or isn’t communicated, in those decisions about how the Chicago Police Board reached their decisions
- Charles Pearson, CPB decision case # 00PB2418
- Donyal Williams, CPB decision case # 07PB2626
- Gerald Callahan, CPB decision case # 06PB2610
- Gregory Gilfillan, CPB decision case # 00PB2438
- John Sebeck, CPB decision case # 00PB2411
- Patrick Minogue, CPB decision case # 99PB2396
- Bryan Vander Mey, CPB decision case # 04PB2540
- William Cozzi, CPB decision case # 06PB2640
Media Coverage
Here is coverage of the report and amendments to the ordinance.
- Chicago’s Thick Blue Wall – Reason
- Who disciplines rogue police? – The Chicago Reporter
- Police Board Reforms Stall – NBC 5
- Attempt to penalize absent Chicago police disciplinary board members stalls – Chicago Tribune
- Cops Keep Jobs even after Infractions – ABC 7
- Report: Only about a third of Chicago police officers brought up for termination in the last 10 years have actually been fired – Chicago Tribune
- Report: Police Board Rarely Disciplines Cops – NBC 5
- Chicago Police Board Lets Abusive Officers Slide – Progress Illinois